Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 956 F.2d 22 - Local Drug Hospital and Health Care Employees Union v. Brooks Drug Company

Local Drug Hospital and Health Care Employees Union v. Brooks Drug Company’s Empirical Analysis

956 F.2d 22 · 1992

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably McCarthy v. Azure (1994), Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd (2002)

15 federal appellate ·

220199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Macharia v. Hodel · Ottley Seiu v. Schwartzberg · Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he scope of authority of arbitrators generally depends on the intention of the parties to an arbitration, and is determined by the agreement or submission.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “draw[] its essence from the collective bargaining agreement,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.