Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 956 F.2d 287 - Nofziger v. 87-1

Nofziger v. 87-1’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 2012
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2012

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

90199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kubrick · Lehman v. Nakshian · Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · Standefer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Departments and agencies have primary responsibility for the administrative enforcement of the post-employment restrictions found in the Ethics in Government Act, i.e., 18 U.S.C. § 207 . The Department of Justice may initiate criminal enforcement in cases [under 18 U.S.C. § 207 ] involving aggravated circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Bragg’s application makes no showing that distinguishes his attorney’s fees from those incurred in a regular grand jury investigation. Thus, Bragg’s claim for reimbursement must fail as his fees were not incurred in an investigation involving a different standard of criminal law than is regularly applied to private citizens.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “since the statute only contemplated awarding reimbursement of fees if no indictment was brought, it follows that Congress never considered waiving sovereign immunity for the payment of any post-indictment attorneys' fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.