Redden v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
956 F.2d 302 · 1992
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 42 · 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 49 U.S.C. § 10901 · 49 U.S.C. § 10903
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Public Citizen v. United States Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“foreclose[s] the Commission from regulating all line transfers under section 10901. Otherwise, Congress's decision to enact [section 11343], and to impose special requirements on line transfers falling within that provision, would be inexplicable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Company, Inc., Intervenors. United Transportation Union v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Company, Inc., Intervenors · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce Commission“[t]he Commission is free ... to resolve ambiguity about the respective coverages of the two sections in any reasonable manner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Company, Inc., Intervenors. United Transportation Union v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Company, Inc., Intervenors · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce Commission“Despite the exact phrasing of § 11343(a)(2), in which the word “property” functions as the direct object only of the infinitive “to operate,” it is well-settled that § 11343(a)(2) encompasses acquisitions of assets (a “purchase” of “property of another carrier”) as well as acquisitions of equity (a “purchase ... of another carrier”).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.