Davidson v. Garry’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2005
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Batson v. Kentucky · Haines v. Kerner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although pro se litigants normally receive extra latitude in their pleadings, attorneys who represent themselves are not held to a lesser standard than attorneys who represent others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.