Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 956 P.2d 1081 - Astill v. Clark

Astill v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2025

9 state decisions

301998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shell Oil Co. v. Gutierrez · Morvant v. Construction Aggregates Corp. · State v. Webb · Polythane Systems, Inc. v. Marina Ventures International, Ltd. · State v. Rammel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the mental or physical condition (including blood group) of a party, or of a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician, dentist or appropriate health care expert, or to produce for examination the person in his custody or legal control. The order may be made only on a motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is to prevent witnesses from being influenced or tainted by the testimony of other witnesses,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.