State v. Moavenzadeh’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Bobic (2000), State v. Ward (2003)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 118 Wash. 2d 151 - State v. Hopper · 125 Wash. 2d 797 - State v. Campbell · 120 Wash. 2d 196 - State v. Simon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As for the second and third degree theft counts, the term "theft" is arguably adequate to convey an intentional, wrongful taking of the property of another. But the property value elements of these crimes do not appear in any form in the information. Those charges are therefore constitutionally defective even assuming the "intent to deprive" element was adequately charged.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[i]f the document cannot be construed to give notice of or to contain in some manner the essential elements of a crime, the most liberal reading cannot cure it.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pry · State v. McCarty“did knowingly advance and profit by compelling Bobbie J. Bartol by threat and force to engage in prostitution; and did advance and profit from the prostitution of Bobbie Bartol, a person who was less than 18 years old.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Khlee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.