Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 956 P2D 335 - Hermreck v. State

Hermreck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2014

12 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Love v. State · Gilbert v. Cosco Inc. · Candelaria v. State · Chavez-Becerra v. State · Witt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tlhere is only one prudent way for an offer of proof to be made at trial. The attorney who seeks to offer evidence, which has been refused or to which an objection has been upheld, should take the initiative. The offer of proof should then take the form of counsel's eliciting the proposed testimony directly from the witness, or entering the tangible evidence in the record, all outside of the hearing of the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The lack of an offer of proof impacts the district court's ruling and severely impedes appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) A person is guilty of aggravated assault and batiery if he: [[Image here]] (iti) Threatens to use a drawn deadly weapon on another unless reasonably necessary in defense of his person, property or abode or to prevent serious bodily injury to another ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.