Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 956 P.2d 647 - Lasher v. Paxton

Lasher v. Paxton’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Westminster v. SKYLINE VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY · Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp. · Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. Barness

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he . . . cost did not accrue until defendant ordered and received a copy and thereby became obligated to pay for it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 3262 - Lidman v. Nugent, No. Cv96-0052905s (Mar. 13, 2001)
  2. “`Accrual' in this sense, means due and payable or vested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 3262 - Lidman v. Nugent, No. Cv96-0052905s (Mar. 13, 2001)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.