956 So. 2d 1016 - Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Griffith v. Kentucky · Powell v. Nevada · 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State · 737 So. 2d 275 - Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the United States Supreme Court held that `the Confrontation Clause of the Federal Constitution's Sixth Amendment bars the admissibility of out-of-court testimonial statements by an unavailable witness offered in a criminal trial to prove the truth of a matter asserted (also known as hearsay) unless the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness about the statement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.