Tanner v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 824 So. 2d 583 - Hensarling v. Hensarling · 784 So. 2d 943 - Hollon v. Hollon · 755 So. 2d 1077 - SNc v. JRD, JR. · 723 So. 2d 1175 - Andrews v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n .appellate court must find a [chancery court] in error where the [chancery court] improperly considers and applies •the Albright factors. . In determining whether the [chancery court] abused [its] discretion in applying the Albright factors, the appellate court reviews the evidence and testimony presented at trial under each factor to ensure the [chan-eery court’s] ruling was supported by [the] record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.