Seeber v. State

Thomas SEEBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 23, 2007.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-05-23

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2018

5 state decisions

Relies on Florida Bar re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar · 511 So. 2d 688 - Grosse v. State · State v. Woodard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-05-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Arthur B. Brandt of Brandt & Gufford, Stuart, for appellant.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled "Motion to Modify Sentence." The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and, after the sixty-day jurisdictional window expired, denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard,866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State,511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied,519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988).

¶5GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.