Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

956 So. 2d 35

956 So.2d 35

2006 La.App.4Cir. 1323

Holt v. Richardson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 2007

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 2007-03-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BELSOME, J.,

¶1concurs.

¶2|,I respectfully concur in the result but write separately to note that the ruling with regard to the unusual set of facts in this ease does not in any way alter Pfiffner and its progeny, which continue to stand for the proposition that objects left in the body generally do not require expert testimony. Within the limited context of the circumstances in this case, however, the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in granting the motion for summary judgment.

/956/so2d/35 · .json · Public domain