Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

956 So. 2d 559

Dannenberg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-05-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2015

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-05-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of Dannenburg’s motion for jail time credit because the motion was facially insufficient. However, we caution the trial court that it is the responsibility of the court, not the Lake County jail, to calculate jail time credit.

¶2AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
/956/so2d/559 · .json · Public domain