Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 F.2d 12 - United States v. McLaughlin

United States v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

957 F.2d 12 · 1992

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Brandon (1994), United States v. McCarthy (1996)

70 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

6801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 6002

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Davis v. Alaska · Kastigar v. United States · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “uphold a district court's denial of a motion to suppress if any reasonable view of the evidence supports it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he fact that two defendants assert antagonistic defenses does not, per se, require severance, even if defendants are hostile or attempt to cast blame on each other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.