Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 F.2d 145 - Darby v. Kemp

Darby v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

957 F.2d 145 · 1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Virginia Western District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · McKart v. United States · Honig v. Doe · Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance · McGee v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The exhaustion doctrine allows an agency to exercise its discretion and apply its expertise, ensures autonomy, and avoids premature intervention by the courts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he hearing officer's determination shall be final unless, pursuant to 24 CFR part 26, the Secretary or the Secretary's designee, within 30 days of receipt of a request decides as a matter of discretion to review the finding of the hearing officer. The 30 day period for deciding whether to review a determination may be extended upon written notice of such extension by the Secretary or his designee. Any party may request such a review in writing within 15 days of receipt of the hearing officer's determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “These exceptions include futility of administrative review ... and inadequacy of administrative remedies____ Further, exhaustion may be excused if its application would leave an administrative decision unreviewed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.