Hayden v. Ja Reickerd’s Empirical Analysis
957 F.2d 1506 · 1992
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc. (2007), Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, Inc. (1993)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. · In re Disbarment of Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... whether the [state-law cause of action] confers nonnegotiable state-law rights on employers or employees indepen dent of any right established by contract, or, instead, whether evaluation of the [state law] claim is inextricably intertwined with consideration of the terms of the labor contract. If the state tort law attempts to define the meaning of the contract relationship, that law is preempted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Not every dispute ... tangentially involving a provision of a collective-bargaining agreement is preempted by Sec. 301.... Clearly, Sec. 301 does not grant the parties to a collective-bargaining agreement the ability to contract for what is illegal under state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he collective bargaining agreement cannot supersede Hayden’s state law right to be free from battery and tortious retaliatory conduct in all events.”); Burnette v. Godshall, 828 F.Supp. 1439, 1446 (N.D.Cal.1993) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.