Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 F.2d 1575 - Great Lakes Dredge Dock Company v. Tanker Robert Watt Miller Chevron Transport Corporation S/s Robert Watt Miller Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co

Great Lakes Dredge Dock Company v. Tanker Robert Watt Miller Chevron Transport Corporation S/s Robert Watt Miller Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co’s Empirical Analysis

957 F.2d 1575 · 1992

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably McDonald's Corporation v. Robertson (1998), United States of America v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez (2001)

57 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

680199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bonner v. City of Prichard · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. · CPC International Inc. v. Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. · Liegl v. Webb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is neither the law of the case nor binding precedent”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “); Self v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 832 F.2d 1540 (11th Cir. 1987) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “free to give that question fresh consideration”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.