Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 F.2d 162 - United States v. Daniel

United States v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

957 F.2d 162 · 1992

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
5
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Resio-Trejo (1995), United States v. Chaney (1992)

52 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

4501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 659 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Nicholas v. United States · Brody v. Guercio · Ohse v. Hughes · Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “supporting the probative value of the conviction. Id. This she failed to do. The district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the conviction for general impeachment purposes. 16 Broncho's contention that the ten year period should run from the date Waterman's probation ended is without merit. Probation is not”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since ... the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The standard of review for jury instructions is usually whether the court's charge, as a whole, is a correct statement of the law and plainly instructs the jurors as to the principles of law applicable to the fact issues confronting them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.