Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 F.2d 26 - United States v. Heller

United States v. Heller’s Empirical Analysis

957 F.2d 26 · 1992

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Davignon v. Clemmey (2003), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Anchor Properties (1994)

25 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

2601992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 751 · 18 U.S.C. § 3172 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 1631

Relies on Houston v. Lack · Kashif v. United States · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Thompson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'judicial officer' in this context . . . mean[s] a judge, not an employee in the office of the clerk”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “pro se status [does not] absolve [a litigant] from compliance with the Federal Rules of Procedure.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action ... to any other such court in which the action ... could have been brought at the time it was filed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.