Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 F.2d 394 - Crot v. Byrne

Crot v. Byrne’s Empirical Analysis

957 F.2d 394 · 1992

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · University of Tennessee v. Elliott · Button v. Harden · 481 F. Supp. 1315 - Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a state agency 'acting in a judicial capacity . . . resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate,' federal courts must give the agency's factfinding the same preclusive effect to which it would be entitled in the State's courts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.