Sybaritic Inc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2014
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Land-O-Nod Company v. Bassett Furniture Industries Incorporated Eb · Falkirk Mining Company v. Japan Steel Works Limited · The Toro Company and Toro Sales Company v. Ballas Liquidating Company and Weed Eater, Inc., and H. Spencer Stone Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the nature and quality of the contacts with the forum state; (2) the quantity of the contacts with the forum state; (3) the relation of the cause of action to the contacts; (4) the interest of the forum state in providing a forum for its residents; and (5) the convenience of the parties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This analytical framework incorporates the notions of both `minimum contacts' and `fair play and substantial justice'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“negotiated, drafted, presented and executed in Japan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.