Dall v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
957 F.2d 571 · 1992
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Abernathy v. Wandes (2013), Zhuang v. Datacard Corporation (2005)
26 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Coco v. United States · United States v. Kraemer · United States v. Shabazz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]laims which were raised and decided on direct appeal cannot be relitigated on motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.