Dulin v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis
957 F.2d 758 · 1992
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Bland v. Sirmons (2006), Demarest v. Price (1997)
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · McCleskey v. Zant · Rodriguez v. Maynard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless [he] can demonstrate cause for the default and actual prejudice as a result of the alleged violation of federal law, or demonstrate that failure to consider the claims will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“some objective factor external to the defense”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“a lack of reasonable access to the rules as distinguished from basic ignorance of the rules or the law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.