Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

957 F.2d 912

Docket No. 90-5242.

Michael Sindram v. Shirley M. Nelson

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Feb. 11, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 17, 1992.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-02-11

Relies on Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley · Walker v. Washington

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-02-11

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before SILBERMAN, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon consideration of appellees' motion for summary affirmance, the court's order to show cause and appellant's motion for summary reversal in response thereto, it is

¶2

ORDERED that the court's order to show cause be discharged. It is

¶3

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed May 25, 1990. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). It is

¶4

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied.

¶5

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

/957/f2d/912 · .json · Public domain