Sutarsim v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Raza v. Gonzales · Guzman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Roberts v. Gonzales · Sihotang v. Sessions · Xin Qiang Liu v. Lynch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“petitioner . . . ha[d] not submitted any specific evidence that Buddhists, or Chinese Buddhists, . . . face[d] heightened risks in Indonesia.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Djokro v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.