Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 FSUPP 70 - Rashid v. Kite

Rashid v. Kite’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
February 2016
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2016

2 district ·

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain · Strawbridge v. Curtiss · City of Indianapolis v. Chase Nat Bank of City of New York · Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) in the person’s absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties, or (2) the person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in the person’s absence may (i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person’s ability to protect that interest or (ii) leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations by reason of the claimed interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “precedent supports the proposition that a contracting party is the paradigm of an indispensable party.”). 4 . The First Circuit recently reiterated this distinction:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.