Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 FSUPP2D 473 - Matana v. Merkin

Matana v. Merkin’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Foman v. Davis · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely 'the means of accomplishing the breach,' " Matana , 957 F.Supp.2d at 492 (quoting Powers Mercantile Corp. v. Feinberg , 109 A.D.2d 117 , 490 N.Y.S.2d 190 , 193 (1st Dep't 1985) ), and caused no injury "distinct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “turns on whether the fraud claim is 'essential' to the breach of fiduciary duty claim, or whether the fraud claim is 'incidental' to the fiduciary duty claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Under New York law, the statute of limitations applicable to an unjust enrichment claim depends on the nature of the substantive remedy plaintiff seeks.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.