State v. Eichorst’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Meredith v. State · Scott v. Irmeger · Fuller v. State · Rupert v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“previous conviction of operating while intoxicated” encompasses convictions both for OWI and for operation with an illegally-high BAC. See Ind.Code § 9-13-2-130 (2010) (" 'Previous conviction of operating while intoxicated’ means a previous conviction ... in Indiana of ... a crime under IC 9-30-5-1 through IC 9 — 30—5—9[.]”). 2 . The State’s motion to reconsider appears to have been filed in anticipation of the trial court’s subsequent dismissal of the Clas¿ D felony charge. ¡' 3 . "Propinquity” may be defined as "nearness in place[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wilson“[a] person who operates a vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent to at least eight-hundredths (0.08) gram of alcohol but less than fifteen-hundredths (0.15) gram of alcohol per ... (1) one hundred (100) milliliters of the person’s blood; or (2) two hundred ten (210) liters of the person’s breath; commits a Class C misdemeanor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.