State v. Betha’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2014
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pena · State v. Dunn · State v. Bishop · State v. Lafferty · State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant may be convicted of an offense included in the offense charged but may not be convicted of both the offense charged and the included offense. An offense is so included when: (a) It is established by proof of the same or less tham all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While it is true that [the] defendant twice assaulted [the victim] during the aggravated burglary, he assaulted her a third time after he left the scene of the burglary and was in the act of committing aggravated kidnaping.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although a trial court's determination on the admissibility of evidence is a question of law reviewed for correctness, its decision is generally accorded a good deal of discretion by an appellate court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.