Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 P2D 855 - Gayler v. State

Gayler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Gleason v. State (2002), Lancaster v. State (2002)

59 state decisions

3701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Romano v. United States · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · Hopkinson v. State · State v. Spears · Horn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Drugs, Ladies and Gentleman, is there a more insidious or terrible disease that af-feets our society today? It tears families apart; steals away our youth. It's ripping the seams of our nation. Costs the taxpayers millions of dollars. ... Ladies and Gentleman, Lincoln County Law Enforcement is taking the war on drugs dead serious. They are not going to tolerate the delivery of methamphetamine or any drugs in this county. It doesn't matter if it's a small amount, like what we had here, or a large amount. We are not going to tolerate it. Absolutely not.... This is your opportunity, as a jury, to take a stand with Lincoln County Law Enforcement and say that we will not tolerate drug dealers in our county. We will not tolerate it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.