Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

957 So. 2d 136

In re Harper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 1, 2007

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2007-06-01

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2010

13 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with his clients, and failed to deposit an advance fee into his client trust account. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Billy Rex Harper, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 18613, be publicly reprimanded.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall enroll in and attend one full day of Ethics School offered by the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Practice Assistance and Improvement Committee.

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent will voluntarily participate in the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Fee Dispute Resolution Program regarding fees charged to Frederick Bogan.

¶6IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/957/so2d/136 · .json · Public domain