Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 SO2D 220 - State v. Lee

State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · 796 So. 2d 649 - State v. Neal · 425 So. 2d 1222 - State v. Trahan · Spinoza v. Mancusi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the marijuana and cocaine were found on the backseat where, according to Officer Hollins, only the defendant had been and where he had been observed to be moving about, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support a determination that the defendant intentionally possessed both the cocaine and the marijuana. See State v. Major, 03-3522 (La.12/1/04), 888 So.2d 798 (wherein the supreme court explained that possession can be established by either actual physical possession or by constructive possession. The State can establish the latter by demonstrating that the defendant had dominion and control.).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “and moving around while in the back seat of the car. Officer Hawkins explained that he also saw the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.