957 So. 2d 595 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 967 So. 2d 835 - State v. Sigler (2007), 2 So. 3d 132 - State v. Meshell (2009)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 403 So. 2d 956 - Ray v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · State v. Weller · 934 So. 2d 1167 - State v. Paul · 944 So. 2d 203 - Sanders v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the statutory elements of the lesser included offense are always subsumed by those of the charged offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]n instruction on a permissive lesser included offense is appropriate only if the allegations of the greater offense contain all the elements of the lesser offense and the evidence at trial would support a verdict on the lesser offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To prove the crime of Committing an Unnatural and Lascivious Act, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1. (Defendant) (copy from charge) with (person named in charge). 2. The act was unnatural and lascivious. - Definitions. “Unnatural” means not in accordance with nature or with normal feelings or . behavior. “Lascivious” means a wicked, lustful or unchaste, licentious, or sensual intent on the part of the person doing an act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.