Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 957 S.W.2d 163 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2018

8 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 119th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cook v. State · Duron v. State · Ex Parte Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a written instrument ... accuses someone of a crime with enough clarity and specificity to identify the penal statute under which the State intends to prosecute,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “even if the instrument is otherwise defective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.