Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

958 F.2d 367

Docket No. 92-6079.

Fitz v. A Zollicoffer

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 2, 1992. Decided March 17, 1992.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-03-17

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Big Deal, Incorporated, as Owner of the F/v Big Deal in a Cause of Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability v. Ronald Linley Pouchie

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-03-17

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-467)

Michael Steven Fitz, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Michael Steven Fitz appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Fitz v. Zollicoffer, No. CA-91-467 (E.D.Va. Jan. 7, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

All parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction with appellate review by this Court, rather than the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(3) (West Supp.1991)

/958/f2d/367 · .json · Public domain