Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

958 F.2d 370

Docket No. 92-6093.

Venable v. Eb Walker

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 2, 1992. Decided March 18, 1992.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Wirth-Strahler & Son, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellant

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-801-AM)

Manuel H. Venable, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Manuel H. Venable appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. Walker, No. CA-91-801-AM (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/958/f2d/370 · .json · Public domain