Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

958 F.2d 370

Docket No. 92-6024.

Charles Amos Walker, Jr. v. L. Jackson George M. Hampton

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 2, 1992. Decided March 17, 1992.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1995

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re: Wirth-Strahler & Son, Incorporated, Debtor-Appellant

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-249-3)

Charles Amos Walker, Jr., appellant pro se.

Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Charles Amos Walker, Jr., appeals from the magistrate judge's order dismissing his lawsuit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988).* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Walker v. Jackson, No. CA-91-249-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 23, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1)

/958/f2d/370 · .json · Public domain