Hoover’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably LRL Properties v. Portage Metro Housing Authority (1995), Kauthar SDN BHD v. Sternberg (1998)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson · Agency Holding Corporation v. Malley-Duff & Associates Inc Crown Life Insurance Company · United States v. Peltier · Dayco Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[A]lthough Rule 9(f) apparently was designed simply to require a higher level of information in the pleadings, the federal courts have employed the rule as a screening device for time-barred claims....'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'this bare assertion of delayed discovery [is] insufficient to prevent the statute of limitations from running.' ” Id. at 744 . This Court observed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“enable a particular defendant to determine with what it is charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.