Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 958 P2D 422 - Baxley v. State

Baxley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of America (2001), Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. State (2002)

29 state decisions

1501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Zamarello · Zeman v. Lufthansa German Airlines · State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. · Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. Peck · Langdon v. Champion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The public trust doctrine provides that the State holds certain resources (such as wildlife, minerals, and water rights) in trust for public use and that government owes a fiduciary duty to manage such resources for the common good of the public as beneficiary.[ 42 ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party raising a constitutional challenge to a statute bears the burden of demonstrating the constitutional violation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The legislature shall pass no local or special act if a general act can be made applicable. Whether a general act can be made applicable shall be subject to judicial determination. Local acts necessitating appropriations by a political subdivision may not become effective unless approved by a majority of the qualified voters voting thereon in the subdivision affected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.