State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1920 · 5 U.S.C. § 8148
Relies on San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Hines v. Davidowitz · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Gibbons v. Ogden · Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[section] 8148 [of FECA] does not assume that the federal workers' compensation scheme preempts state action against a person who commits fraud. On the contrary, it assumes that the federal workers' compensation scheme does not preempt state action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“concedes that the State's prosecution creates no actual conflict with the administration of [the federal law]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.