Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

958 So. 2d 1053

Docket No. 1D07-1293.

Rife v. State

Michael A. RIFE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-06-13

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2011

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Michael A. Rife, pro se, Petitioner.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4By petition for writ of mandamus, Michael A. Rife seeks an order compelling a *1054 ruling on a motion to correct illegal sentence he alleges he mailed to the circuit court in November 2006. The circuit court has indicated, however, that it has no record of the filing of the original copy of that motion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. This disposition is without prejudice to petitioner's right to file a copy of the motion, bearing petitioner's original signature, with the circuit court. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.515(b). We encourage the circuit court to expedite its consideration and disposition of Rife's motion, once it is filed.

¶5ALLEN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

/958/so2d/1053 · .json · Public domain