Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 958 SO2D 172 - Killen v. State

Killen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · United States v. Marion · Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Lovasco · Mooney v. Holohan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the pre-indictment delay prejudiced that defendant, and (2) the delay was an intentional device used by the government to obtain a tactical advantage over the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.