Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 958 SW2D 736 - State v. Lewis

State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2018

21 state decisions

110199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Bell v. United States · State v. Denton · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In ascertaining the intent of the legislature, this Court may look to `the language of the statute, its subject matter, the object and reach of the statute, the wrong or evil which it seeks to remedy or prevent, and the purpose sought to be accomplished in its enactment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person commits an offense who knowingly damages any structure by means of a fire or explosion: (1) Without the consent of all persons who have a possessory, proprietary or security interest therein; or (2) With intent to destroy or damage any structure to collect insurance for the damage or destruction or for any unlawful purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When one statute contains a given provision, the omission of the same provision from a similar statute is significant to show that a different intention existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.