Clough v. Rush’s Empirical Analysis
959 F.2d 182 · 1992
Citation profile
54 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co. (1995), Price v. Philpot (2005)
54 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · Sisson v. Ruby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very judgment shall be set forth on a separate document. A judgment is effective only when so set forth and when entered as provided in Rule 79(a),”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]fficiency and judicial economy would not be served by requiring the parties to return to the district court to obtain a separate judgment.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“containing neither a discussion of the court's reasoning nor any dispositive legal analysis.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.