Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

959 F.2d 231

Docket No. 91-7750.

Clark v. Spruill

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 5, 1992. Decided April 3, 1992.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-04-03

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Cooper v. Rogers

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-04-03

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-91-738-BO)

Michael Craig Clark, appellant pro se.

William Thomas Culpepper, III, Edenton, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Michael Craig Clark appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Spruill, No. CA-91-738-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/959/f2d/231 · .json · Public domain