Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 959 F.2d 757 - Brooks v. Hilton Casinos Inc.

Brooks v. Hilton Casinos Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

959 F.2d 757 · 1992

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Gillette v. Delmore (1992), 1993-1 Hillis Motors Inc v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Association (1993)

33 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

440199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. Green · Salve Regina College v. Russell · Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. · 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. · Kahn v. Grant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But the fifth amendment's self-incrimination clause does not give taxpayers a right to withhold financial information from the IRS unless they can show an appreciable possibility of prosecution for a non-tax crime.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Individual factors that do not, as a matter of law, establish [a contract] cannot, by some peculiar alchemy, create a legally binding relationship when combined with each other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We review a district court's determination of state law de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.