Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 959 F.2d 808 - Clark v. Busey

Clark v. Busey’s Empirical Analysis

959 F.2d 808 · 1992

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Carlos Castro-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Jose Luis Araujo (2001), Leon v. IDX Systems Corp. (2006)

47 federal appellate · 2 district ·

4701992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission · Stock West, Inc. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ubject matter jurisdiction to decide the merits of the underlying action is a 'condition precedent' to an award of fees or costs under the EAJA.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Jurisdictional defects that arise when a suit is filed in the wrong federal court may be cured by transfer under the federal transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1631.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in any court having jurisdiction of that action.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.