Seibold v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Marley · United States v. Seward · Miller v. State · United States v. Schoon · Houston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the accused reasonably believed at the time of acting that the first and second elements were present, even if that belief was mistaken; but the accused’s belief will not suffice for the third element. An objective determination must be made as to whether the defendant’s value judgment was correct, given the facts as he reasonably perceived them.[ 7 ]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McGee v. State · Allen v. State“[an objective determination must be made as whether the defendant's value judgment was correct, given the facts as he reasonably perceived them”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McGee v. State · State v. Garrison“5 A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on the necessity defense if she presents”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McGee v. State · State v. Garrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.