McJimsey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 831 So. 2d 1263 - Giles v. State · 696 So. 2d 738 - Coolen v. State · Pearce v. State · 604 So. 2d 799 - Marshall v. State · 928 So. 2d 368 - Grier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is justified in using force likely to cause death or great bodily harm, if he or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent: One, imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or another. Or two, the imminent commission of a felony against himself or another; however, the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is not justifiable if you find: One James Tucker III was attempting to commit, committing or escaping after the commission of a felony. Or two, James Tucker III initially provoked the use of force against himself. [emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.