959 So. 2d 459 - State v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 725 So. 2d 1291 - State v. Juluke · 408 So. 2d 1221 - State v. Long · 405 So. 2d 1080 - State v. Parish · 803 So. 2d 916 - State v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] reviewing court may impinge on the trier of fact’s discretion “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” State v. Mussall, 523 So.2d 1305 (La.1988).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the court of appeal erred by substituting its appreciation of the evidence for that of the factfinder”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“failed to accord due deference to the rational credibility choices made by the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.